2011年1月4日星期二

Privacy, only one dessert you

Privacy, only one dessert you

The so-called privacy, my understanding is: that a person's private affairs should not let others know. Both a private matter, a person does not violate the law of private things, this is their most basic private rights. However, the curiosity of privacy is the common feature of all mankind, not sub-color, now the Internet is so advanced, a variety of media watching closely the privacy of public figures, to exposure to meet the people their curiosity (in order to monitor public figures, but also the responsibility of the media), can most people are exposed to the privacy of public figures, the common people also have privacy, but the media is not interested, because there is no selling point.
However, politicians in some countries is not allowed to gossip, this privacy will be revealed once ruined his political career, not just allow people to enjoy as dessert simple.
Dong Qiao Hong Kong writer said in his book: "Privacy is no longer private, is a staple of dessert." Is because people are only willing to become a sweet taste, Cao also "Dream of Red Mansions" in said: "The lust that is obscene , informed more obscene. "The point is that people want to know is prostitution violations. U.S. President Richard Nixon in his memoirs, "the gladiator arena," said: "People are basically fair, but they also like to enjoy the fun, love to hear whether it is official misconduct, or the story of those people."
People have a natural desire for privacy of others and the pursuit of psychology. In the UK, most people believe that high quality of its nationals, men like gentlemen and women like ladies, because the British strict rigid, polite speech act, but the British did not lose the curiosity of privacy in any one country, we remember, the British Crown Prince Prince Charles's wife Diana and lover flirting with twenty-minute phone recording of exposure, so that increased sales goes tabloid reporter has made a fortune, this is just the dessert? This is simply the eyes of the British is a just-baked cake. But, finally, the pursuit of privacy led to the beautiful Diana and her lover both died in a car accident Fayyad, this is not a dessert, right?
People interested in the privacy of the neighborhood around, talk, talked about maybe this is the dissemination of real dessert. Diana's death should be a dark psychological kills people for one another, the person's life, this is not a dessert, I could not goods "sweet spot" inside the sweet.
Love is a person's privacy, but public figures can not be said here is just so simple privacy.
In the United States, public figures (I am not here to discuss the privacy of celebrity exposure problems, but all the government officials) is not only the privacy of the privacy issues, the United States because of the extremely strict supervision of public officers and public demand for public officials, especially is that public officials like the president if the moral model, the flower can not tolerate the slightest thing, 1987 • Democratic presidential candidate Gary Hart campaign, the wind at first along the ship all the way through, however, is that he did not manage well the past his "zipper" and having an affair with a prostitute out of the newspapers revealed that he had to withdraw from the race, this is not a privacy issue by others but a glimpse of public opinion to the problem, because the Americans asked their leaders if the moral model , which requires public figures (especially politicians) can not have immoral.

没有评论:

发表评论